Pendampingan Penyusunan Produk Hukum Daerah Tentang Retribusi Pelayanan Persampahan Pemerintah Kabupaten Lumajang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36277/abdimasuniversal.v4i1.176Keywords:
Assitance, Legal Products, Retribution, Waste ServicesAbstract
The health condition of Indonesian citizens is guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Indonesia. The constitutional guarantee mandates that the state is obliged to provide public health services to its citizens. One way to ensure that people have good health conditions is through the provision of waste management services. There was a paradigm shift after the issuance of Law No. 18 of 2008 on Waste Management, where waste management is not only the duty and responsibility of the Local Government but also the obligation of the community. Community involvement in waste management is included as a form of retribution in supporting waste management policies. Community involvement to contribute to waste management policies in the form of retribution for waste services needs to be supported by the existence of local legal products as the legal basis for collecting the retribution. In order to participate in development in the Lumajang Regency area, especially in the stage of preparing legal products in the form of Regional Regulations Concerning Public Service Retribution on Waste Services in 2021, community service is held in the form of mentoring activities. Assistance is provided to prepare Academic Papers and Draft Regional Regulations. Mentoring activities are carried out using the focus group discussion method and assistance in the preparation of legal products. With the implementation of this mentoring activity at the end of 2021, an Academic Paper and a Draft Regional Regulations Concerning Public Service Retribution on Waste Services have been compiled.
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Perihal Undang-undang. Rajawali Pers.
Basyir, A. (2020). Pentingnya Naskah Akademik Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Dalam Mewujudkan Hukum Aspiratif dan Responsif. Commerce Law Journal, 1(1), 80–100.
Beck, L. C., Trombetta, W. L., & Share, S. (1986). Using focus group sessions before decisions are made. North Carolina Medical Journal, 47(2), 73–74.
Burke, C. S., Salas, E., Smith-Jentsch, K., & Rosen, M. A. (2012). What A Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. In Urban Development & Local Government Unit World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315593173-4
Gusmar, D. (2011). Urgensi Naskah Akademik Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Yang Baik. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 40(3), 297–304.
Mulya, W., Maslina, M., & Marlina, M. (2020). Sosialisasi dan Penerapan Pemilahan Sampah Berdasarkan Karakteristik. Abdimas Universal, 2(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.36277/abdimasuniversal.v2i2.78
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Lumajang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Lumajang Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Lumajangg Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Retribusi Pelayanan Persampahan/Kebersihan.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Cara Perhitungan Tarif Retribusi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Penanganan Sampah, Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2008 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. http://ridum.umanizales.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/6789/377/4/Muñoz_Zapata_Adriana_Patricia_Artículo_2011.pdf
Widiati, S. (2001). Planet Kita, Kesehatan Kita (Laporan Komisi WHO Mengenai Kesehatan Dan Lingkungan). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
